Foucault and Biopolitics: Power and Control

- 1.
“So… are we just lab rats in a giant NHS waiting room?” — unpacking the uncanny relevance of foucault and biopolitics in post-pandemic Britain
- 2.
Who dropped the mic on biopolitics? A quick (and slightly cheeky) genealogy of foucault and biopolitics
- 3.
“Power doesn’t repress—it produces”: how foucault and biopolitics rewrote the rulebook on authority
- 4.
From “population” to “problem”: the dark turn where foucault and biopolitics meets exclusion
- 5.
The NHS as a biopolitical cathedral: where compassion and control hold hands
- 6.
Neoliberalism walks into Foucault’s seminar: the awkward bromance of foucault and biopolitics and market logic
- 7.
Stats don’t lie (but they do… biopoliticise): data, dashboards, and the illusion of objectivity
- 8.
“Just follow the science”—or follow the power? COVID-19 as a masterclass in foucault and biopolitics
- 9.
Resistance is not futile—it’s *artisanal*: how grassroots movements hack foucault and biopolitics
- 10.
So… what do we *do* with foucault and biopolitics? Three exits (none of them lifts)
Table of Contents
foucault and biopolitics
“So… are we just lab rats in a giant NHS waiting room?” — unpacking the uncanny relevance of foucault and biopolitics in post-pandemic Britain
Blimey—ever had that eerie feeling while queuing up for your booster jab, or scrolling through yet another public health alert, that somebody’s got a spreadsheet full of your life choices? Nah, love, it’s not paranoia. It’s foucault and biopolitics quietly sipping tea in the background, watching you argue over whether to wear a mask on the Tube. Michel Foucault — bless his French-philosopher soul — wasn’t just scribblin’ in notebooks like a moody GCSE student; he was sketching the invisible wiring of modern power. His take on foucault and biopolitics flips the old “king chops heads off” model on its head: now, power doesn’t just *punish*—it *nurtures*, *tracks*, *optimises*, and — yes — *vaccinates*. It’s governance with a stethoscope, not a sword. And in Blighty? Oh, we *excel* at it: from calorie labels on Greggs sausage rolls to contact-tracing apps named after Norse gods, biopolitical logic is stitched tighter than a Savile Row waistcoat.
Who dropped the mic on biopolitics? A quick (and slightly cheeky) genealogy of foucault and biopolitics
Right—before you start quoting Foucault at your local pub quiz and accidentally win a pint of Doom Bar, let’s get one thing straight: while some scholars like to nod reverently at Georges Canguilhem or even old Karl himself, the bloke who truly *lit the fuse* on biopolitics was Foucault. Yep, the father of biopolitics isn’t some dusty 18th-century doc with leeches in his pocket—it’s Michel, with his turtlenecks and intense gaze, strutting into Collège de France in the ’70s like he’s about to drop a mixtape. In his lectures—later compiled as “Society Must Be Defended” and “The Birth of Biopolitics”—he traces how, from the 18th century onward, states stopped obsessing over *individual bodies* (hence: *discipline*) and shifted to managing *populations* (hence: *biopolitics*). Think workhouses → welfare state → NHS app notifications. One seamless continuum of foucault and biopolitics, innit?
“Power doesn’t repress—it produces”: how foucault and biopolitics rewrote the rulebook on authority
Here’s the kicker—most of us were taught power = cops, prisons, kings with big wigs. Foucault? He went, “Nah, mate—*that’s* so 1666.” His real brain-bender? Power isn’t just top-down repression. It’s capillary: trickling through schools, clinics, even *your Fitbit*. Especially with foucault and biopolitics, power becomes *productive*. It doesn’t just say “don’t”; it says “*do*—and here’s how, when, and why.” Want an example? Consider the UK’s Change4Life campaign. It doesn’t *ban* sugar—it *nudges* you with cartoon apples and postcode-based obesity stats. That’s biopower: soft, data-savvy, and eerily persuasive. As Foucault put it in History of Sexuality Vol. 1: “Power is everywhere… because it comes from everywhere.” Chilling. Poetic. And oddly applicable to your local GP surgery’s waiting-room leaflets.
From “population” to “problem”: the dark turn where foucault and biopolitics meets exclusion
Let’s not romanticise this, though. Foucault’s genius wasn’t just in spotting how states care for life—it was in exposing how that same care *selects* who *deserves* to live well. Enter: *thanatopolitics* (yes, that’s a word—and no, it’s not from a metal band). When foucault and biopolitics get tangled with racism, xenophobia, or austerity logic, the result isn’t just health policy—it’s *hierarchy*. Think Windrush scandal: people *legally* here for decades suddenly “non-citizens” overnight, denied healthcare, jobs, dignity—all under the guise of “population management.” That’s biopower turning necropolitical: not just managing life, but quietly authorising death-by-bureaucracy. Foucault hinted at this in his 1976 lectures: “If the power of the modern state is to foster life, it must equally… expose *some* lives to death.” Heavy stuff. Makes you side-eye that “hostile environment” policy a bit harder, doesn’t it?
The NHS as a biopolitical cathedral: where compassion and control hold hands
Love it or moan about it (usually the latter, bless us), the NHS is arguably Britain’s most magnificent monument to foucault and biopolitics. Born in 1948—not from charity, but *calculated sovereignty*—it’s a system where care and control coexist like tea and biscuits. Free at point of use? Glorious. But also: your GP knows your BMI, smoking status, cervical screening date, and whether you’ve missed your flu jab—all logged, flagged, followed up. That’s not surveillance *despite* care; it’s surveillance *through* care. Even the infamous “postcode lottery” in treatment access? Textbook biopolitics: uneven life-chance distribution masked as clinical “efficiency.”

Neoliberalism walks into Foucault’s seminar: the awkward bromance of foucault and biopolitics and market logic
Surprise twist: Foucault *liked* neoliberal theory—at least, he found it *fascinating*. In his 1978–79 Collège lectures (The Birth of Biopolitics), he spends *ages* dissecting Hayek, Friedman, and the Chicago School—not to endorse them, mind, but to show how they reinvented biopower. Forget the nanny state: enter the *entrepreneurial self*. Now, “health” isn’t just your right—it’s your *duty*. Your *responsibility*. Missed your screening? “Well, you *chose* that.” Gain weight? “Just *exercise more*, love.” Under foucault and biopolitics, even wellness becomes a moral audit. And guess who pays? Not the food giants. Not the landlords with mouldy flats. *You*. With a side of £150 for a private dermatologist if NHS waiting lists stretch longer than the M25.
Stats don’t lie (but they do… biopoliticise): data, dashboards, and the illusion of objectivity
Pop quiz: what’s more powerful than a riot cop? A *heatmap*. In the age of foucault and biopolitics, numbers aren’t neutral—they’re *narrative engines*. Consider these UK-relevant nuggets:
| Indicator | 2010 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy (male, UK) | 78.2 | 77.4 | ↓ 0.8 yrs |
| Healthy Life Expectancy (male, UK) | 63.5 | 61.7 | ↓ 1.8 yrs |
| Public health budget (real terms) | £4.8bn | £3.1bn | ↓ 35% |
Source: ONS & Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2024. See how those dips aren’t just “bad luck”? They’re *policy outcomes*—framed as “demographics” or “lifestyle choices,” but shaped by a biopolitical calculus that quietly accepts some decline as… *manageable*. As Foucault warned: “The ‘evidence’ is never innocent.”
“Just follow the science”—or follow the power? COVID-19 as a masterclass in foucault and biopolitics
Ah, 2020. When “R” numbers became dinner-table chat and everyone suddenly fancied themselves an epidemiologist. But beneath the graphs and the grim daily briefings? A full-blown biopolitical theatre. Lockdowns, track-and-trace, vaccine passports—these weren’t just emergency measures. They were *accelerations*. Overnight, the state claimed unprecedented authority over bodies *in motion*: where you walk, who you hug, whether your pub quiz happens on Zoom. And yet—crucially—it was sold not as coercion, but as *civic duty*. “Protect the NHS” wasn’t a slogan; it was a *biopolitical mantra*. Even dissent got folded in: anti-maskers weren’t “rebels”—they were “vulnerable to misinformation,” ripe for *behavioural intervention*. That’s foucault and biopolitics at peak efficiency: resistance becomes just another data point to optimise.
Resistance is not futile—it’s *artisanal*: how grassroots movements hack foucault and biopolitics
But hold up—Foucault wasn’t a doom-monger. He believed power *always* breeds counter-power. And in Britain? We’ve got *flair* for it. Look at grassroots mutual-aid networks during lockdown: neighbours feeding elders, GPs smuggling insulin to undocumented folks, midwives crowdfunding for asylum-seeking mums. These aren’t “charity”—they’re *biopolitical sabotage*: creating care *outside* state metrics, refusing the logic that some lives are “low priority.” Even the #LetUsSwim protests (yes, *that* one) were low-key biopolitical: reclaiming bodily autonomy in open water, against risk-assessment algorithms. Foucault would’ve grinned: “Where there is power, there is resistance—and yet, or rather consequently, this resistance is never in a position of exteriority in relation to power.” In other words: same playground. Different rules.
So… what do we *do* with foucault and biopolitics? Three exits (none of them lifts)
Right—enough theory. How do we *live* with this? First: *question the categories*. “At-risk group”, “hard-to-reach community”, “non-compliant patient”—these aren’t descriptions. They’re *technologies*. Second: *demand transparency in algorithms*. If your local council uses predictive analytics to allocate social care (and they do), ask: *whose data trained it? Whose suffering is invisible in the model?* Third—and most radical—*reclaim “health” as collective joy*, not individual optimisation. A society that measures success by *years lived in pain* (not just *life expectancy*) isn’t broken—it’s working *exactly* as foucault and biopolitics predicted. But we can rewrite the script. Start with community kitchens. End with universal basic services. Fancy a go? Then hop over to The Great War Archive, dive into our History section, or lose yourself in the symbolic labyrinths of Iconography Byzantine Art Hidden Meanings—because sometimes, decoding power starts with reading a halo.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Foucault's concept of biopolitics?
Foucault’s concept of foucault and biopolitics describes a historic shift in how power operates: from sovereign power (which *takes life*) to biopower (which *manages life*). Starting in the 18th century, states began focusing on the *population*—its health, birth rates, longevity, hygiene—as a biological field to be regulated. This isn’t tyranny; it’s governance via statistics, public health, and “optimisation.” In short: foucault and biopolitics reveals how modern power cares for us *so it can steer us*.
Who is the father of biopolitics?
While precursors exist (e.g., Rudolf Virchow’s “medicine is a social science”), Michel Foucault is unambiguously the father of biopolitics as a critical theory. His 1976 Collège de France lectures—later published as Society Must Be Defended—coined and rigorously developed the term. No one before him tied the management of *populations* so tightly to the evolution of liberal governance, racism, and modern statecraft. So yes: when we talk foucault and biopolitics, we mean *him*—turtleneck, chain-smoke, and all.
What did Foucault say about biopower?
Foucault argued that biopower is the *positive* counterpart to disciplinary power: where discipline trains *individual bodies* (in schools, prisons, barracks), biopower regulates *species existence*—birth, death, illness, reproduction—across entire populations. Crucially, he stressed biopower isn’t repressive; it’s *productive*. It generates knowledge (epidemiology, demography), institutions (public health agencies), and subjectivities (“the responsible citizen”). With foucault and biopolitics, power doesn’t just say “no”—it whispers, “*Let me help you live better… on my terms.*”
What is the main idea of Foucault's theory?
The main idea threading through Foucault’s work—including foucault and biopolitics—is that *power is not held, but exercised*. It’s not a possession of kings or states; it’s a dynamic network of relations, embedded in knowledge, institutions, and everyday practices. Power doesn’t just crush—it *constitutes*: it shapes what we know, who we are, and what we can imagine. In biopolitics, this means life itself becomes a political object. As Foucault put it: “For millennia, man remained what he was for Aristotle: a living animal with the additional capacity for political existence; modern man is an animal whose politics places his existence as a living being in question.” Spine-tingling. True. And very, very relevant.
References
- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault
- https://www.britannica.com/biography/Michel-Foucault
- https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n09/michel-foucault/the-birth-of-biopolitics
- https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/biopolitics-after-foucault




